Don't get me wrong: I admire Ford's writing tremendously. However, that doesn't grant him permission to conduct snarky character attacks on George W. Bush or make a number of generalizations not up to par for someone of his intellect. I'm a centrist, and even if I were an avid Tea Party member or staunch liberal, I'd consider calling the president a "moron" childish. He states almost with certainty that the Republicans stole the election, and that Gore was "egregiously lax" by not calling for a recount. This comes off as nothing short of spiteful, and I find there are too many cynics these days who can rant about problems, but never raise solutions. I never supported Bush, but couldn't even fathom saying that he didn't offer prompt aid to the people of New Orleans because "African-American people weren't Republicans." A shout-out to Mr. Levin on this as well, as he leads Ford right into the answer with his nice little remark on "people you don't need to rescue." I understand his frustration directed towards the Bush administration, but constructive criticism would've been welcome.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Richard Ford "Politics"
Ford's recent article "Gov't on Our Minds" objectively points out American apathy towards midterm elections and how regardless of one's political stance, there is a need for "less government in daily lives." He even mentions Democrats' "tepid achievements." His writing is smart, witty, and provocative. Quite frankly, I wouldn't use any of those three adjectives to describe the usual political commentary, but I found Ford's mature viewpoints unique. After reading this, I expected him to elaborate further on these unique ideas in the Levin interview.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment